Tuesday, April 5, 2016

Montgomery County Council still fighting the future, Uber and Lyft

The Montgomery County Council crackdown on ride-sharing services like Uber and Lyft, which not only raised your fares but dings you 25 cents on every Uber trip you take, isn't over yet. New WMATA chief Paul Wiedefeld and the members of the WMATA board of directors will meet with the Council today at 12:45 PM. But last week, seven councilmembers sent a letter to Wiedefeld demanding he not partner with Uber or Lyft on paratransit services.

Instead, the council wants to not only extract that 25-cent Uber tax you're paying on each ride now, but also want you, the taxpayer, to subsidize - guess who - Barwood cab, the Council's idea of cutting-edge transportation. Like in D.C., cab companies would handle paratransit services beyond what MetroAccess provides.

Term limits are gaining steam thanks to the Council's disregard for residents' concerns about development from Lyttonsville to Chevy Chase to Westbard. Unlike paratransit, there will be an app for that.

5 comments:

  1. What a poorly written jumble of nonsense.

    First, cab companies already pick up the slack when no MetroAccess vehicle is available. You're acting like this is some new action taken by the council.

    Second, the 25-cent surcharge against Uber is because they don't provide transportation for disabled people so the county has to do it for them. Uber already knows that the fee against them goes away if they, themselves begin to provide rides to disabled people.

    Third, the council believes taxis should remain the MetroAcess alternative because they're a licensed, trained and supervised fleet of vehicles. Alternatively, just about anyone can become in Uber driver in a couple of days after they rubber stamp you. It's perfectly reasonable for people to think putting our most needy citizens in the charge of random, unlicensed people is a bad idea that only opens the door to abuses.

    Fourth, I have no idea what Uber and Lyft have to do with term limits and development, so I'll just chalk that up to poor writing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, go and fuck yourself^^^

    Uber and Lyft are great and you're just archaic. Cabs are filthy and run by terrorists.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Troll, much, 5:06? Way to allow racist comments on your site, Dyer.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I personally love Uber (never used Lyft; I assume it's great too). But a 25 cent/ride surcharge hardly constitutes a "crackdown." Seems pretty reasonable to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @10:15 what councilmember office do you work at?

    ReplyDelete